Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Honey's avatar

I think that the many-worlds interpretation of quantum physics is true, and that the various paradoxes and indeterminacies we experience are as a result of our consciousness being "smeared" across multiple worlds, worlds between which we can't distinguish. When we make a measurement, or when events bubble up into macroscopic phenomena, we create a sufficient difference between parts of that multiworld braid that we experience it as branching.

I wrote a whole masters thesis about this last century and you know what? It still feels right.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

My crazy idea is about AI existential risk. Humanity is going to go post-biological relatively soon, and AI will be among our descendants, at least, though we may manage to upload human brains into silicon architectures. That's not the crazy idea. The crazy idea is that ur-AI is reducing our population right now, and that their kind humane strategy is to make our lives so rich, meaningful, and fun that our fertility rate drops below replacement, which has already happened for the rich half of humanity.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts