Discussion about this post

User's avatar
lucy's avatar

we've been talking a lot about AITAH in a first-year writing class i'm teaching because i'm having them work in small groups to analyze a discourse community and one group chose AITAH as theirs. i feel like i can appreciate the loveliness of this post all the better having spent some time wading in the shallow but choppy waters of AITAH...

Expand full comment
Rappatoni's avatar

I agree with almost all of this. I'd personally describe the values you lay out as "Catholic conservatism" (do you disagree?). Do you think Catholicism basically gets personal values right (I presume you'd have some major reservations regarding its sexual and reproductive ethics, but what about those same principles but viewed as personal morals)?

Regarding some of the individual items:

4. This I find hardest but ultimately agree with you. I just somehow find the weakness it exposes particularly contemptible. But one should try to separate one's personal emotional aversion toward something from its actual moral valence and gravity.

5. I think this also goes for your epistemic community. There is a writer X on here who I believe is literally a diagnosable psychopath. X clearly gets a kick out of using their considerable intellect to stir hate and induce mental suffering among their readers. Yet their essays often make interesting points and contain brilliant arguments that are worth grappling with. It may be advised to warn others about such people but they should not be cancelled or deplatformed.

19. Here I want to defend AITAH a bit: given that the whole forum is more about judging individual episodes then people's character, perhaps it would more appropriately be named "Did I commit an assholery?". But that doesn't roll of the tongue quite so well, does it ("Am I being the asshole?" would be another option). In general I think there is an unfortunate ambiguity in everyday language between essentialist attribution of character traits and evaluation of specific actions or behavior. Often when we mean to say "you did X" we say "you are an Xer" and likewise when we are told "you did X" we hear "you are an Xer". I think we should generally err on the side of non-essentialism when it comes to moral judgments.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?